If you need to play "consider the evidence" on a person experience paper you can use yourself as a main source. You can also use people you know and are close to you if the subject applies to the and use their evidence. This way the argument will still be form personal experience and not from news feeds or other sources that are not close to you.
The best tidbit i seen on the "Academic Writing is an Analysis" is that he says to not write a summary unless asked too. The professor or teacher will ask for a summary if they really wanted one. Otherwise you should not write a summary cause it is not needed.
The characteristics from "Three Characteristics of Academic Writing" are on the rubric under the outstanding column. If you add these three characteristics to your paper when your writing and revising it your paper will be superb and not just a mediocre or under-average paper. This will help you get your point across more clearly to your audience, and they will most likely fully understand where your coming from.
I agreed with you when you said that reading the assignment before and after, that you would have a better chance of having a correct paper. I also agreed that using yourself as a main source will make a good argumentive paper.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, I did notice the characterisics of academic writing under the rubic outstanding column. So that is the true way to get a better paper. Also, you for got to mention what tidbit that needs more explanation, but good pointing out the summary issue.
ReplyDelete